| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
MomoInu

Joined: 15 Aug 2006 Posts: 69 Location: Manassas, VA
|
Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 6:29 pm Post subject: Contax N lens sample image thread |
|
|
There are probably quite a few of us now that have a functioning Contax N lens on their Canon EOS body. Conurus deserves a hearty congratulations for making this work.
I've started this thread for users to share their images and show what is possible from the Contax N - Canon EOS combination.
Here is an image taken with the Zeiss N 24-85mm/f3.5 and a Canon 5D.
61mm at f9.0, 1/125th sec, ISO 100
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mOnAmis
Joined: 14 Sep 2006 Posts: 29
|
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 9:46 pm Post subject: Another 100MS shot |
|
|
| I can't seem to get the full frame jpegs small enough to get past the 250k limit. So this one is cropped.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mOnAmis
Joined: 14 Sep 2006 Posts: 29
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MomoInu

Joined: 15 Aug 2006 Posts: 69 Location: Manassas, VA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
conurus Site Admin

Joined: 15 Aug 2006 Posts: 533 Location: Vancouver, Canada
|
Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 1:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, I quietly upped the limit to 5MB after seeing mOnAmis' post...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zeiss4me
Joined: 12 Jan 2007 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 4:25 am Post subject: Contax 24-85 compared with Canon 24-75/2.8 L? |
|
|
I was wondering if people here have compared results of the Contax 24-85 N lens on the Canon 5D with those from the Canon 24-70/2.8L. How does the image quality compare? Are there drawbacks to the conversion in terms of user convenience vs buying the Canon L lens? In a similar vein, I have been quite happy with the Canon L series lenses I own (I don't have the 24-70/2.8L). The image quality of the tele lenses I own (135/2 L, 200/2.8L, 70-200/4 and 300/4 IS L) lenses is very good. Any optical advantage to going with a Contax N lens converted?
Jason
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mOnAmis
Joined: 14 Sep 2006 Posts: 29
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mOnAmis
Joined: 14 Sep 2006 Posts: 29
|
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 7:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| When will the new firmware for the 100MS ship?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mOnAmis
Joined: 14 Sep 2006 Posts: 29
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jrn813

Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 89 Location: Cotulla, Texas
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mOnAmis
Joined: 14 Sep 2006 Posts: 29
|
Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
That gives a very nice effect. I asked a dealer here in the UK if Cokin filters were available in 95mm and they said no, try Lee filters. So its good news that they make some that will fit. With the Lee system I woould have to buy two fittings since the 17-35 will one accept a push on fitting and my 24-85 requires a screw on fitting..
This brings me onto a subject that I have been thinking about for some time. Why is the 17-35 so big especially the filter size compared to Nikon and Canon offerings? Is it that the N lenses were designed from the ground up to be FF capable? Or is it the no compromise nature of Zeiss's approach to lens design? Or what? Afterall the Nikon especially does a pretty good job by all accounts.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jrn813

Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 89 Location: Cotulla, Texas
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jrn813

Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 89 Location: Cotulla, Texas
|
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
The Sun Finally Came Out....
Spring Is Here. The Mesquite Never Blooms Till The Cold Weather Is Done...
Seldom Is It Fooled... I Have Seen It Happen Twice In 50+ Years....
1Ds - Contax N 17-35mm @ 34mm - f18 - 1/15 - Iso100 - +1ev - Circular Polarizer - Cropped From The Top For Composition
Not My Favorite Windmill, But Only Two Minutes From The House....
New Mesquite & Half Moon Rising....
_________________ jrn813 (John R) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jrn813

Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 89 Location: Cotulla, Texas
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jrn813

Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 89 Location: Cotulla, Texas
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|